Author: money9111 Subject: 7 different numbers selected Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:36 am (GMT -8) Hello… I’m having some difficulty with this question… hope you can help: Seven different numbers are selected from the integers 1 to 100, and each number is divided by 7

Here is the original post: 
Data Sufficiency :: 7 different numbers selected

Author: harsh.champ Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:15 am (GMT -8) rickyishere wrote: Hi, Can the quants out here help in solving this problem: A firm has 4 senior partners and 6 junior partners. How many different groups of 3 partners can be formed in which at least one member of the group is a senior partner. ( 2 groups are considered different if at least one group member is different)

Read the rest here:
GMAT Math :: RE: Difficult Selection Problem

Author: papgust Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:57 am (GMT -8) Hi Chrissy, I don’t intend to de-motivate you in any way but considering that you have only 4 days for your exam, you really can’t do anything extravagant in your prep. Even if you work out hard, you’ll become tired during the exam and lose focus. The key is to be confident during the exam.

Here is the original post:
GMAT Strategy :: RE: 4 days till GMAT EXAM and still scoring 550 on PR CAT tests!

Author: chrissy_927 Subject: 4 days till GMAT EXAM and still scoring 550 on PR CAT tests! Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:40 am (GMT -8) Hello All, I have been taken the exam 3 times already (320 with not much studying as u can tell; 550 [28V and 36Q]; 550 [27V and 39Q] and this coming Saturday is gonna be my 4th try. I’m hoping to get a 680 and have been taking a course with the GMAT guru in SF for a few weeks now

View original post here: 
GMAT Strategy :: 4 days till GMAT EXAM and still scoring 550 on PR CAT tests!

Author: harsh.champ Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:10 am (GMT -8) Q5) According to the passage, which of the following statements best describes the difference between science and pseudo- science?

See more here:
Reading Comprehension :: RE: Dogmatic behavior

Author: soumyopriyosaha Posted: Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:06 am (GMT -8) gmatnmein2010 wrote: In an August 1, 2002 legal memo that would later become a lightning rod for controversy, Assistant Attorney General for the Office of Legal Counsel Jay Bybee went on record as one of the first and most senior government officials to consider controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing with so-called unlawful enemy combatants. A) controversial interrogation tactics to be permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing B) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing C) controversial interrogation tactics as permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions irrelevant in dealing D) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions to be irrelevant in dealing E) controversial interrogation tactics permissible and international laws such as the Geneva Conventions as irrelevant in dealing i usually get stumped on very lengthy SC pls help to deal them IMO B

More here: 
Sentence Correction :: RE: Assistant Attorney General

Author: harsh.champ Subject: Dogmatic behavior Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:59 pm (GMT -8) Our propensity to look out for regularities, and to impose laws upon nature, leads to the psychological phenomenon of dogmatic thinking or, more generally, dogmatic behaviour: we expect regularities everywhere and attempt to find them even where there are none; events which do not yield to these attempts we are inclined to treat as a kind of ‘background noise‘; and we stick to our expectations even when they are inadequate and we ought to accept defeat. This dogmatism is to some extent necessary.

See the rest here:
Reading Comprehension :: Dogmatic behavior

Author: thephoenix Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:58 pm (GMT -8) the non underlined word differentiated indicates use of idiom now the correct idiom is differentiated b/n X and Y where X and Y are llel here ia A)the idiom used is differentiated X with Y….which is wrng B)here diff b/n X with Y..wrng c)amng is used for more then 2 items , here we have two items hence we need b/n…….wrng d)b/n is not used…wrng e) correct

See the rest here:
Sentence Correction :: RE: indexing and searching

Author: thephoenix Posted: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:51 pm (GMT -8) the s/c is very complicate initially the error was not easy to spot , whenever i used to face such a situation i then start checking or rather comparing the options in order to look for changes done….the beauty of GMAT s/c is that the option will have difference either in the start or in the end.on quick glance u will find that its 2-3 split in two of the option there is a comma after aristocracy and in rest 3 there is no comma —> so this is the clue now if we use comma then the phrase Charles Dickens’ gripping book portraying the suffering of the proletariat under the brutal subjugation of the French aristocracy will become a modifying phrase and will modify phrase A tale of two cities.However Without a comma after aristocracy, the modifying phrase is not properly separated from the subject (A Tale of Two Cities) and verb (had).hence we need a comma so 3 options without comma are eliminated i.e A,B,and E now b/n C and D,in D the sentence improperly compares unlike parts AND the pronoun it toward the end of the sentence has no clear antecedent,hence eliminated so C sud be the ans

Here is the original post: 
Sentence Correction :: RE: Tale of Two Cities