Author: rahul.s Posted: Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:23 am (GMT -8) But doesn’t the passage also mention that ‘Prior to Kerber’s work, educational historians barely mentioned women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929 work is the notable exception’ So wouldn’t that make E a strong contender? The OA is B , but I’ve been advised that there is a possibility the OA is wrong

More here: 
Reading Comprehension :: RE: Education of Girls