Author: grockit_andrea Posted: Sun Jul 11, 2010 4:53 pm (GMT -7) I think this would be either a 3 or a 4.

See more here:
GMAT Essays (AWA) :: RE: Help with AWA.. My first ..please rate

Author: arora007 Subject: Analysis of arguments: Common logical fallacies Posted: Sat Jul 03, 2010 9:35 pm (GMT -7) I read it in one of the notes… The E-rater will look for how well you express that you have identified the logical reasoning flaws

See the rest here: 
GMAT Essays (AWA) :: Analysis of arguments: Common logical fallacies

Author: hhuizeng Subject: Please rate my argument essay, thank you! Posted: Thu Jun 24, 2010 7:25 pm (GMT -7) Here is the argument that I wrote recently. Could you please have a look at it and give some some feedback to improve. Thank you very much.

Read more here:
GMAT Essays (AWA) :: Please rate my argument essay, thank you!

Author: pnk Subject: Historian: There is no direct evidence that timber Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 6:48 pm (GMT -7) Historian: There is no direct evidence that timber was traded between the ancient nations of Poran and Nayal, but the fact that a law setting tariffs on timber imports from Poran was enacted during the third Nayalese dynasty does suggest that during that period a timber trade was conducted. Critic: Your reasoning is flawed

More: 
Critical Reasoning :: Historian: There is no direct evidence that timber

Author: tpr-becky Posted: Mon May 24, 2010 2:15 pm (GMT -7) Essentially this question says that because every theory in physics has been ultimately rejected, this theory will not be final. (Basically this is an analogy argument that says the new thing will turn out just like the old thing) A.

Here is the original post: 
Critical Reasoning :: RE: Quantum Mechanics – Parallel Reasoning

Author: ssgmatter Posted: Sat May 22, 2010 8:28 am (GMT -7) kevincanspain wrote: How about an analogy? The balance is Phil’s bank account is currently $50,000, $1000 higher than it was three months ago and $2000 higher than it was 6 months ago.

Read more here:
Critical Reasoning :: RE: Earth age

Author: uwhusky Posted: Fri May 14, 2010 4:13 pm (GMT -7) I see. So using a math analogy, instead of making 2 step calculation as shown on MGMAT, OG and actual GMAT could have 3 or even 4 step calculation?

Read the original here:
GMAT Verbal & Essays :: RE: Did you score 40+ in Verbal? I have a question por vous…

Author: neoreaves Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:50 am (GMT -7) IMO E This weakens the analogy used A is incorrect because we have to weaken the historical analogy …knowing or not knowing information is irrelevant …what we need to attack is the act of deception

Read the original post: 
Critical Reasoning :: RE: govt. and columbus – source CR-1000

Author: ansumania Subject: govt. and columbus – source CR-1000 Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 5:04 am (GMT -7) From time to time, the press indulges in outbursts of indignation over the use of false or misleading information by the U.S.

Read the rest here: 
Critical Reasoning :: govt. and columbus – source CR-1000